🐻‍❄️ Kirin 810 Vs Snapdragon 710 Have quickly answered :)

TheAI-oriented BPI-EAI80 SBC is based on an Edgeless EAI80 SoC (2x Cortex-M4F cores and an NPU) plus 8MB RAM and SPI flash storage Snapdragon 730G: The Snapdragon 730G has the company's Hexagon 688 DSP with the company's 4th Gen AI engine This provides an unambiguous example of spike-based computation, outperforming all known conventional

HiSiliconKirin 710 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 167033 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 has AnTuTu score of 363186. HiSilicon Kirin 710 comes up with 8 cores, 2200 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 has 8 cores and 2800 MHz frequency. In terms of Graphics, HiSilicon Kirin 710 has Mali-G51 GPU and Bifrost architecture and

HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712HiSilicon Kirin 810 ► remove from comparisonThe HiSilicon Kirin 810 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2019 and contains 8 processor cores. Two fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores with up to GHz and six small power efficient ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to GHz bigLITTLE. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a mid range graphics card called ARM Mali-G52 MP6 with 6 clusters. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 810 integrates a Ascend D100 Lite NPU Da Vinci architecture. The integrates LTE modem supports with Dual Sim VoLTE. For photography, the Kirin 810 integrates the Kirin The memory controller supports LPDDR4X at up to 2133 MHz. Furthermore, WiFi and Bluetooth are integrated in the chip. The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy Snapdragon 710 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SD710 is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. Announced in early 2018, the SD710 is the first of the 700 series and positions itself between the 600 series Snapdragon 660 and 800 series Snapdragon 845. It integrates 8 Kryo 360 cores devided in two big cores most likely based on Cortex-A75 at up to GHz and six small cores most likely based on Coretx-A55 at up to GHz. The memory controller supports LPDDR4X and the integrated graphics card is called Adreno 616. The X15 LTE modem supports 4x4 MIMO with up to 800 MBbit/s download and 150 MBit/s upload. Compared to the older Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm advertises the CPU clusters to be up to 20% faster and the GPU up to 35 %. The Snapdragon 710 is manufactured in the modern 10 nm process at Samsung 10LPP.Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SD712 is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. Compared to the Snapdragon 710 predecessor, the 712 offers a 10% faster CPU and GPU due to clock rate increases 100 MHz for the CPU It was announced early 2019 and positions itself between the 600 series Snapdragon 660 and 800 series Snapdragon 845. It integrates 8 Kryo 360 cores devided in two big cores most likely based on Cortex-A75 at up to GHz and six small cores most likely based on Coretx-A55 at up to or GHz. The memory controller supports LPDDR4X and the integrated graphics card is called Adreno 616. The X15 LTE modem supports 4x4 MIMO with up to 800 MBbit/s download and 150 MBit/s upload. The Snapdragon 712 is manufactured in the modern 10 nm process at Samsung 10LPP.ModelHiSilicon Kirin 810Qualcomm Snapdragon 710Qualcomm Snapdragon 712SeriesHiSilicon Qualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm SnapdragonCodenameCortex-A76/-A55Kryo 360Kryo 360Series Snapdragon Kryo 360HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin 990 - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin 810 - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin 980 - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55Clock1880 - 2270 MHz2200 MHz2300 MHzCores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8Technology7 nm10 nm10 nmFeaturesARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 GHz + 6x Cortex-A55 GHz, LTE Cat-12 1400 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 200 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth 5, WiFi a/b/g/n/ac, AGPS, Glonass, BaidouAdreno 612 GPU, X15 LTE Modem, Hexagon 685 DSP, Specra 250 ISP, GPS, GLONASS, SBAS, Beidou, GalileoAdreno 616 GPU, X15 LTE Modem, Hexagon 685 DSP, Specra ISPiGPUARM Mali-G52 MP6Qualcomm Adreno 616Qualcomm Adreno 616ArchitectureARMARMARMAnnounced ManufacturerQualcomm Snapdragon SD 710Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 712BenchmarksPerformance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 810 Performance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 710 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 18123 avg 23401 median 24426 21% max 27654 Points min 13595 avg 14925 median 12% max 18181 Points min 13686 avg 13692 median 13692 12% max 13698 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Physicsmin 3501 avg 3731 median 3720 47% max 3972 Points min 1840 avg 2330 median 2477 31% max 2720 Points min 1982 avg 2244 median 2244 28% max 2506 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Physicsmin 3463 avg 3749 median 3782 54% max 4003 Points min 1862 avg 2362 median 35% max 2634 Points min 1946 avg 2226 median 2226 32% max 2506 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 592 avg 598 median 598 26% max 604 Points min 392 avg 393 median 393 17% max 394 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 1890 avg 1920 median 7% max 1949 Points min 1448 avg 1478 median 1478 5% max 1508 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1799 avg 1819 median 1821 19% max 1833 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 5754 avg 5843 median 7% max 5917 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1835 avg 1858 median 1858 26% max 1881 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 5683 avg 5800 median 14% max 5916 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Streammin 787 avg 1443 median 1443 12% max 2099 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memorymin 2565 avg 2600 median 24% max 2634 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Pointmin 11443 avg 11547 median 23% max 11650 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integermin 5224 avg 5235 median 11% max 5245 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Scoremin 6446 avg 6539 median 6539 17% max 6632 Points Mozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score *min 2472 avg 2950 median 2646 3% max 3731 ms min 3035 avg 3370 median 4% max 3800 ms min 2912 avg 3648 median 4% max 4383 ms Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 15947 avg 16825 median 16604 16% max 17925 Points min 9771 avg 11817 median 12% max 12802 Points min 10328 avg 11945 median 11945 11% max 13562 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 71 avg median 83 19% max 97 Points min 57 avg median 16% max 72 Points min 47 avg median 14% max 72 Points AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Scoremin 135848 avg 136892 median 137134 47% max 137693 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEMmin 3343 avg 6694 median 7636 23% max 8159 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UXmin 43917 avg 44744 median 44198 54% max 46663 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPUmin 37446 avg 45655 median 47945 15% max 49284 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPUmin 63606 avg 65473 median 40% max 66830 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Scoremin 155113 avg 162553 median 162918 29% max 169262 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UXmin 55189 avg 62040 median 58957 49% max 71973 Points min 7553 avg 26433 median 26433 22% max 45313 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEMmin 45079 avg 53673 median 47554 38% max 68387 Points min 36796 avg 41477 median 41477 33% max 46158 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPUmin 56693 avg 68299 median 64645 12% max 83558 Points min 49409 avg 52655 median 52655 10% max 55901 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPUmin 92494 avg 97432 median 94457 34% max 105346 Points min 67712 avg 68330 median 68330 25% max 68948 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Scoremin 259370 avg 291444 median 295579 28% max 319383 Points min 172068 avg 188895 median 188895 18% max 205722 Points PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Testsmin 178496 avg 180262 median 180127 24% max 182163 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Visionmin 3402 avg 3476 median 3491 18% max 3518 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storagemin 4719 avg 4933 median 10% max 5372 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 7541 avg 8133 median 7695 50% max 9164 Points min 6453 avg 6824 median 44% max 7460 Points min 6832 avg 7554 median 7554 49% max 8276 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Scoremin 9189 avg 10361 median 9824 49% max 12070 Points min 7041 avg 8137 median 8201 41% max 9345 Points min 8346 avg 9745 median 49% max 11143 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Battery Lifemin 368 avg 554 median 11% max 739 min Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 810 → 100% n=17Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 → 75% n=17Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 → 78% n=17 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average 15. 1307520 checking url part for id 12116 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 10981 +0s ... 0s 2 checking url part for id 11301 +0s ... 0s 3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 135518 +0200 + ... 5 composed specs + ... 6 did output specs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12116 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 12116 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10981 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 10981 + ... 11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11301 + ... 12 got single benchmarks 11301 + ... 13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 26 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 27 return log +0s ... Apaperbedaan antara HiSilicon Kirin 810 dan Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G? Temukan mana yang lebih baik dan performa mereka secara keseluruhan dalam peringkat chipset ponsel. When a new product comes out, it is normal for people to inquire about the novelties they have with respect to predecessors, especially if we talk about SoCs. Knowing if the new processor is on par with old technologies or completely revolutionizes the market is essential to determine if it is worth the investment. Today Huawei has presented the chip they will use in the new Nova 5, the Kirin 810. This processor that promises to be a direct competition of the Snapdragons series 7, and has left everyone surprised thanks to its performance. However, for you to have a clearer idea, we present this Kirin 810 vs Kirin 710 vs Kirin 980 Comparison, and so you can see why the next mid-range smartphones look so promising. What's Inside 1Kirin 810 vs Kirin 710 vs Kirin 980 Comparison – Specification SheetKirin 810 vs Kirin 710 vs Kirin 980 Comparison – CPU ComparisonKirin 810 vs Kirin 710 vs Kirin 980 Comparison – Comparison GPUKirin 810 vs. Kirin 710 vs. Kirin 980 Comparison – Other Specs ComparisonConclusionOverall Winner Kirin 810 Kirin 810 vs Kirin 710 vs Kirin 980 Comparison – Specification Sheet SoCKirin 810Kirin 710Kirin 980 CPU2 X Cortex-A76 6 X Cortex-A55 X Cortex-A73 4 X Cortex-A53 X Cortex-A76 2 X Cortex-A76 4 X Cortex-A55 GPUMali-G52Mali-G51Mali-G76 MemoryLPDDR4LPDDR4 1866MHz2-LPDDR4x 1866MHz ModemDual VoLTELTE 12 / 13 DL= 600Mbps UL= 150MbpsLTE 21 / 13 DL= 1400Mbps UL= 150Mbps Mfc. Process7nm TSMC12nm TSMC7nm LPP Kirin 810 vs Kirin 710 vs Kirin 980 Comparison – CPU Comparison The revelation has been today, but we already have important data about the performance of the new Kirin 810. That is why we can make a complete comparison with its brothers and competitors. The first thing is to talk about the CPU, which will be responsible for the vast majority of processes and the management of artificial intelligence. The Kirin 810 has raised the bar within Huawei, although it is not the first SoC of the company to adopt the 7nm TSMC lithography, it is still an engineering achievement. This process represents a 50% improvement in the density of transistors with respect to 8nm, and 64% with respect to 10nm. This translates into more power in the same space. With regard to the structure of the CPU, this octa-core chip is made up of 2 high-performance Cortex-A76 units at and 6 Cortex-A55 units at Additionally, for the AI tasks the chip comes with a DaVinci NPU from the same manufacturer, being a great progress to separate the use of third-party hardware. For its part, and following this Kirin 810 vs. Kirin 710 vs. Kirin 980 Comparison, we break down what the Kirin 710 offers us. This chip, dedicated to the mid-range, has a 12nm lithography, and although at the time it was revolutionary for Huawei, is already somewhat outdated. The good thing is that it remains in the fight thanks to its octa-core architecture with four Cortex-A73 units at and 4 Cortex-A53 at Another feature that keeps it relevant is that it also has NPU for AI functions, worth admiring on a mid-range chip. For the benefit of the comparison, it is fair to mention the other Huawei 7nm processor, the Kirin 980. This processor was born as a competitor of the highest range in the company, standing above the Snapdragon 845 thanks to its octa-core architecture, with 2 Cortex-A76 at 2 Cortex-A76 at and 4 Cortex-A55 at Of the three participants, it is the only one with a different architecture having high and medium performance units. It also has a dual NPU, achieving a unique performance with regard to AI. Also Read Exynos 7904 vs Snapdragon 670 vs Snapdragon 675 Comparison Winner Kirin 980 Reason Better cores Kirin 810 vs Kirin 710 vs Kirin 980 Comparison – Comparison GPU We continue this Kirin 810 vs. Kirin 710 vs. Kirin 980 Comparison in the GPU section. Huawei has always been a pioneer in the use of modern graphics units, and this has not been the exception. Following the trend of creating unique experiences for games, the Kirin 810 uses a customized Mali-G52 GPU to take advantage of the AI features of the Smartphone in which it is installed. It has also been promised that HD games will always work at a minimum of 60FPS. The Kirin 710 is maintained with a mid-range GPU to its credit, the Mali-G51, a unit that today is still very good for image reproduction thanks to its speed of 650MHz. The Kirin 980 premiered at the time a powerful 7nm Mali-G76 GPU unit with a speed of 720MHz. This offers amazing game speeds and 60FPS in the vast majority of games. This is a very closed section between Kirin 810 and 980, and it will depend on how each is optimized in conjunction with Huaweis Turbo technology. Winner Kirin 810 Reason To be mid-range, it is up to the big ones in performance. Kirin 810 vs. Kirin 710 vs. Kirin 980 Comparison – Other Specs Comparison We finished this Kirin 810 vs. Kirin 710 vs. Kirin 980 Comparison with other highlights among these SoCs. The Kirin 810 is still a mystery in some specifications, but for now, we can confirm the use of IVP + ISP to capture photographs, significantly improving the image quality, contrast, and brightness. We also know that it supports Dual VoLTE, perfect to enjoy 2 SIM cards with 4G support. The Kirin 710 is not far behind in qualities. It is also compatible with Dual VoLTE and offers downloads speeds of up to 300mbps and upload speeds of up to 150mbps thanks to the Cat12 and Cat13 protocols. The Kirin 980, meanwhile, has dual ISP for capturing photos, significantly reducing the time it takes to capture it and with lower energy consumption. At the connection level, it has a LTE21 for downloads and LTE13 for the upload, which give it higher speeds than the Kirin 810. Winner Kirin 810 Reason It adapts very well the characteristics of the high range Conclusion Overall Winner Kirin 810 This new SoC that fully enters the mid-range promises to be a revolution in terms of refreshing the power of new terminals. The 7nm lithography is settling more and more between the processors, and this is the first sample of it. Huawei is striving to demonstrate that they can build an entirely own ecosystem around which to work, not only in the highest range but in more accessible ones. The Kirin 810 turns out to be a pleasant surprise, and we can only hope to see its result in the market.

Differencebetween MediaTek Helio P35 and HiSilicon Kirin 810 Check out detailed comparison which includes antutu benchmark results, performance, gaming, processors, number of cores, threads and cache memory.

VS We compared two 8-core processors Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 with Adreno 616 graphics and HiSilicon Kirin 710 Mali-G51 MP4. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5GamingSpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 Performs better in floating-point computationsShows better up to 32% AnTuTu 9 score – 257K vs 195KHas a smaller size transistor 10 versus 12 nm Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 710 Higher GPU frequency ~33% Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 73587 70901 GPU 72514 33222 Memory 35412 33714 UX 75197 57642 Total score 257720 195658 Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression 76 Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s images/s Speech recognition 26 words/s words/s Machine learning 22 images/s images/s Camera shooting 12 images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 96% 84% Graphics test 3 FPS 3 FPS Score 550 554 Gaming Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games PUBG Mobile 39 FPS [Ultra] 51 FPS [Medium] Call of Duty Mobile 35 FPS [Ultra] 29 FPS [Low] Fortnite 26 FPS [Low] 25 FPS [Low] Shadowgun Legends 53 FPS [Low] 56 FPS [Low] World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS [Ultra] 52 FPS [Ultra] Mobile Legends Bang Bang 55 FPS [Ultra] 60 FPS [Ultra] Device Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite 1080 x 2340 Huawei Honor 10 Lite 1080 x 2340 We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors. Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 710 and Kirin 710 CPU Architecture 2x GHz – Kryo 360 Gold Cortex-A756x GHz – Kryo 360 Silver Cortex-A55 4x GHz – Cortex-A734x GHz – Cortex-A53 Cores 8 8 Frequency 2200 MHz 2200 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8-A L1 cache - 256 KB L2 cache 384 KB 512 KB L3 cache 1 MB 1 MB Process 10 nanometers 12 nanometers Transistor count 3 billion billion TDP 5 W 5 W Graphics GPU name Adreno 616 Mali-G51 MP4 Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost GPU frequency 750 MHz 1000 MHz Execution units 2 4 Shading units 128 64 FLOPS 384 Gigaflops Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 1866 MHz 1866 MHz Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s - Max size 8 GB 6 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Hexagon 685 No Storage type eMMC UFS eMMC UFS Max display resolution 3360 x 1440 2340 x 1080 Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 16MP 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 30FPS Video playback 4K at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS Video codecs VP8, VP9 VP8, VP9 Audio codecs Qualcomm Aqstic, aptX, aptX HD AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem X15 LTE - 4G support LTE Cat. 15 LTE Cat. 12 5G support No No Download speed Up to 800 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 5 4 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 710 185 Total votes 243 Related Comparisons Comments Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 710 and Snapdragon 710, or ask any questions

Cpu基准规格和测试 HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 - Geekbench 5, Cinebench R20, Cinebench R15 and FP32 iGPU (GFLOPS) HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810. Samsung Exynos 9611 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710. Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710. HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710HiSilicon Kirin 710 ► remove from comparisonThe HiSilicon Kirin 710 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2018 and contains 8 processor cores 4x Cortex-A73 at up to GHz, 4x Cortex-A53 at up to GHz, BigLITTLE, an ARM Mali G51 MP4, a dual-channel LPDDR4 memory controller and a LTE radio 600 Mbps down, 150 Mbps up. Therefore, the CPU part is similar to the Kirin 960 and 970 both higher clocked, but the graphics card is a lot slower. The Kirin 710 is manufactured at TSMC in 12 nm compared to the 16nm Kirin 960 and 10nm Kirin 970. The HiSilicon Kirin 710F is the same chip with a different package FCCSP - Flip Chip Chip Scale Package and offers the same specifications see our review of the Huawei P Smart Z.Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SD710 is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. Announced in early 2018, the SD710 is the first of the 700 series and positions itself between the 600 series Snapdragon 660 and 800 series Snapdragon 845. It integrates 8 Kryo 360 cores devided in two big cores most likely based on Cortex-A75 at up to GHz and six small cores most likely based on Coretx-A55 at up to GHz. The memory controller supports LPDDR4X and the integrated graphics card is called Adreno 616. The X15 LTE modem supports 4x4 MIMO with up to 800 MBbit/s download and 150 MBit/s upload. Compared to the older Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm advertises the CPU clusters to be up to 20% faster and the GPU up to 35 %. The Snapdragon 710 is manufactured in the modern 10 nm process at Samsung 10LPP.ModelHiSilicon Kirin 710Qualcomm Snapdragon 710SeriesHiSilicon Qualcomm SnapdragonCodenameCortex-A73/-A53Kryo 360Series Snapdragon Kryo 360HiSilicon Kirin 970 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53HiSilicon Kirin 960 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53HiSilicon Kirin 960s GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53HiSilicon Kirin 710 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53HiSilicon Kirin 710A 2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53Clock2200 MHz2200 MHzCores / Threads8 / 88 / 8Transistors5500 MillionTechnology12 nm10 nmFeaturesARM Mali-G51 MP4 GPU, 4x Cortex-A73 GHz + 4x Cortex-A53 GHz, LTE Cat-12 600 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 150 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth WiFi a/b/g/n GHz, AGPS, Glonass, BaidouAdreno 612 GPU, X15 LTE Modem, Hexagon 685 DSP, Specra 250 ISP, GPS, GLONASS, SBAS, Beidou, GalileoiGPUARM Mali-G51 MP4Qualcomm Adreno 616ArchitectureARMARMAnnounced ManufacturerQualcomm Snapdragon SD 710BenchmarksPerformance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 710 Performance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 710 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 11158 avg 16572 median 15% max 22668 Points min 13595 avg 14925 median 12% max 18181 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Physicsmin 1851 avg 2350 median 2478 31% max 2789 Points min 1840 avg 2330 median 2477 31% max 2720 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Physicsmin 1656 avg 2358 median 2459 35% max 2723 Points min 1862 avg 2362 median 35% max 2634 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 330 avg median 14% max 331 Points min 392 avg 393 median 393 17% max 394 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 1320 avg 1338 median 1338 5% max 1356 Points min 1448 avg 1478 median 1478 5% max 1508 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 319 avg 327 median 327 1% max 335 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 1266 avg 1339 median 1339 4% max 1412 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1523 avg 1560 median 1550 16% max 1614 Points min 1799 avg 1819 median 1821 19% max 1833 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 5266 avg 5454 median 5430 6% max 5615 Points min 5754 avg 5843 median 7% max 5917 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1612 avg 1623 median 1623 23% max 1634 Points min 1835 avg 1858 median 1858 26% max 1881 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 5377 avg 5447 median 5447 13% max 5517 Points min 5683 avg 5800 median 14% max 5916 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Streammin 1356 avg 1702 median 14% max 2047 Points min 787 avg 1443 median 1443 12% max 2099 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memorymin 2488 avg 3017 median 3017 27% max 3546 Points min 2565 avg 2600 median 24% max 2634 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Pointmin 9096 avg 9764 median 19% max 10431 Points min 11443 avg 11547 median 23% max 11650 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integermin 4429 avg 4767 median 10% max 5104 Points min 5224 avg 5235 median 11% max 5245 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Scoremin 5366 avg 5857 median 15% max 6347 Points min 6446 avg 6539 median 6539 17% max 6632 Points Mozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score *min 3999 avg 4223 median 4205 5% max 4853 ms min 3035 avg 3370 median 4% max 3800 ms Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 9041 avg 9659 median 9695 9% max 10544 Points min 9771 avg 11817 median 12% max 12802 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 52 avg median 62 14% max 69 Points min 57 avg median 16% max 72 Points AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Scoremin 104012 avg 108955 median 110126 38% max 112870 Points min 135848 avg 136892 median 137134 47% max 137693 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEMmin 9898 avg 13356 median 35% max 32585 Points min 3343 avg 6694 median 7636 23% max 8159 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UXmin 34146 avg 38196 median 36606 45% max 54562 Points min 43917 avg 44744 median 44198 54% max 46663 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPUmin 22245 avg 25701 median 8% max 28462 Points min 37446 avg 45655 median 47945 15% max 49284 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPUmin 54673 avg 61958 median 60404 37% max 73966 Points min 63606 avg 65473 median 40% max 66830 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Scoremin 124870 avg 139210 median 135942 24% max 183420 Points min 155113 avg 162553 median 162918 29% max 169262 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UXmin 55985 avg 58317 median 58317 49% max 60649 Points min 7553 avg 26433 median 26433 22% max 45313 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEMmin 35479 avg 36250 median 36250 29% max 37021 Points min 36796 avg 41477 median 41477 33% max 46158 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPUmin 28697 avg 28859 median 5% max 29020 Points min 49409 avg 52655 median 52655 10% max 55901 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPUmin 60900 avg 66675 median 24% max 72449 Points min 67712 avg 68330 median 68330 25% max 68948 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Scoremin 185725 avg 190100 median 190100 18% max 194475 Points min 172068 avg 188895 median 188895 18% max 205722 Points PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Testsmin 181152 avg 184162 median 184162 24% max 187172 Points min 178496 avg 180262 median 180127 24% max 182163 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Visionmin 3783 avg 4945 median 27% max 5286 Points min 3402 avg 3476 median 3491 18% max 3518 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storagemin 10592 avg 11047 median 24% max 11501 Points min 4719 avg 4933 median 10% max 5372 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 5803 avg 6497 median 6685 44% max 7141 Points min 6453 avg 6824 median 44% max 7460 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Scoremin 7004 avg 8380 median 8525 43% max 9854 Points min 7041 avg 8137 median 8201 41% max 9345 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Battery Lifemin 368 avg 554 median 11% max 739 min Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 710 → 100% n=37Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 → 106% n=37 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average 15. 1307510 checking url part for id 10172 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 10981 +0s ... 0s 2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 135518 +0200 + ... 4 composed specs + ... 5 did output specs +0s ... 6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10172 + ... 7 got single benchmarks 10172 + ... 8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10981 + ... 9 got single benchmarks 10981 + ... 10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 12 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 13 return log + ... Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 Update 2017-09-11 HiSiliconKirin 820e remove from comparison. The HiSilicon Kirin 820e is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced 2022 a VS We compared two 8-core processors Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 with Adreno 660 graphics and HiSilicon Kirin 710 Mali-G51 MP4. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5GamingSpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Performs better in floating-point computationsShows significantly better up to AnTuTu 9 score – 815K vs 195KHas 3 MB larger L3 cache size than the Kirin 710Has a smaller size transistor 5 versus 12 nmAnnounced 2-years and 5-months later29% higher CPU clock speed 2840 vs 2200 MHzBetter instruction set architecture Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 710 Higher GPU frequency ~19% Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 213623 70901 GPU 312145 33222 Memory 130817 33714 UX 152825 57642 Total score 815136 195658 Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite 1060 Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 69% 84% Graphics test 34 FPS 3 FPS Score 5706 554 Gaming Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games PUBG Mobile 83 FPS [Ultra] 51 FPS [Medium] Call of Duty Mobile 60 FPS [Ultra] 29 FPS [Low] Fortnite 26 FPS [Ultra] 25 FPS [Low] Shadowgun Legends 89 FPS [Ultra] 56 FPS [Low] World of Tanks Blitz 112 FPS [Ultra] 52 FPS [Ultra] Genshin Impact 58 FPS [Ultra] - Mobile Legends Bang Bang 60 FPS [Ultra] 60 FPS [Ultra] Device Asus Zenfone 8 1080 x 2400 Huawei Honor 10 Lite 1080 x 2340 We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors. Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 888 and Kirin 710 CPU Architecture 1x GHz – Kryo 680 Prime Cortex-X13x GHz – Kryo 680 Gold Cortex-A784x GHz – Kryo 680 Silver Cortex-A55 4x GHz – Cortex-A734x GHz – Cortex-A53 Cores 8 8 Frequency 2840 MHz 2200 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A L1 cache 512 KB 256 KB L2 cache 1 MB 512 KB L3 cache 4 MB 1 MB Process 5 nanometers 12 nanometers Transistor count billion billion TDP 8 W 5 W Graphics GPU name Adreno 660 Mali-G51 MP4 Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost GPU frequency 840 MHz 1000 MHz Execution units 2 4 Shading units 512 64 FLOPS 1720 Gigaflops Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X Memory frequency 3200 MHz 1866 MHz Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s - Max size 24 GB 6 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Hexagon 780 No Storage type UFS UFS eMMC UFS Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2340 x 1080 Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 1K at 30FPS Video playback 8K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS Video codecs VP8, VP9 VP8, VP9 Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem X60 - 4G support LTE Cat. 22 LTE Cat. 12 5G support Yes No Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps Upload speed Up to 3000 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 6 4 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 888 64 Total votes 77 Related Comparisons Comments Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 710 and Snapdragon 888, or ask any questions

TheTensor accelerator is used in Snapdragon 855/855 Plus The recent progress of scientific technologies is producing a "Cambrian explosive" [ 1] in developing new techniques that lead the world entering promptly into the new artificial intelligence (AI) era The GPU on the SoC is the Adreno 618, and the SoC also comes in with the Hexagon

VS We compared two 8-core processors Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 with Adreno 630 graphics and HiSilicon Kirin 710 Mali-G51 MP4. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5GamingSpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 Performs better in floating-point computationsShows significantly better up to AnTuTu 9 score – 405K vs 195KHas 1 MB larger L3 cache size than the Kirin 71027% higher CPU clock speed 2800 vs 2200 MHzHas a smaller size transistor 10 versus 12 nmBetter instruction set architecture Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 710 Higher GPU frequency ~41%Announced 8-months later Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 102331 70901 GPU 154456 33222 Memory 57724 33714 UX 87647 57642 Total score 405551 195658 Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 81% 84% Graphics test 8 FPS 3 FPS Score 1438 554 Gaming Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games PUBG Mobile 53 FPS [Ultra] 51 FPS [Medium] Call of Duty Mobile 55 FPS [High] 29 FPS [Low] Fortnite 28 FPS [Ultra] 25 FPS [Low] Shadowgun Legends 48 FPS [High] 56 FPS [Low] World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS [Ultra] 52 FPS [Ultra] Mobile Legends Bang Bang 56 FPS [Ultra] 60 FPS [Ultra] Device Xiaomi Pocophone F1 1080 x 2246 Huawei Honor 10 Lite 1080 x 2340 We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors. Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 845 and Kirin 710 CPU Architecture 4x GHz – Kryo 385 Gold Cortex-A754x GHz – Kryo 385 Silver Cortex-A55 4x GHz – Cortex-A734x GHz – Cortex-A53 Cores 8 8 Frequency 2800 MHz 2200 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A L1 cache 128 KB 256 KB L2 cache 256 KB 512 KB L3 cache 2 MB 1 MB Process 10 nanometers 12 nanometers Transistor count 3 billion billion TDP 9 W 5 W Graphics GPU name Adreno 630 Mali-G51 MP4 Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost GPU frequency 710 MHz 1000 MHz Execution units 2 4 Shading units 256 64 FLOPS 727 Gigaflops Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 1866 MHz 1866 MHz Bus 2x 32 Bit 2x 32 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s - Max size 8 GB 6 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Hexagon 685 No Storage type UFS eMMC UFS Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2340 x 1080 Max camera resolution 1x 192MP 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP Video capture 4K at 60FPS 1K at 30FPS Video playback 4K at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS Video codecs VP9 VP8, VP9 Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem X20 - 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 12 5G support No No Download speed Up to 1200 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 5 4 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 845 84 Total votes 111 Related Comparisons Comments Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 710 and Snapdragon 845, or ask any questions F38xc.

uusfd018mw.pages.dev/251

uusfd018mw.pages.dev/471

uusfd018mw.pages.dev/368

uusfd018mw.pages.dev/273

uusfd018mw.pages.dev/92

uusfd018mw.pages.dev/97

uusfd018mw.pages.dev/53

uusfd018mw.pages.dev/324

kirin 810 vs snapdragon 710